TrustScore - How do you rate?
TrustScore Zero
Alex Johnson’s morning light was filtered through the silver sheen of his apartment’s smart glass, which dimmed automatically to reduce screen glare on his sleek holo-dashboard. The room hummed softly with the ambient noise of the city’s 7 a.m. rush — a mixture of electric vehicles and distant drone deliveries. But Alex’s focus was the translucent display hovering before him. His TrustScore flashed bright green, a pristine 987 out of 1000.
“Excellent stability,” the interface noted in its clipped AI voice. “Your rating has increased by 0.03%. Daily progress maintained.”
Alex, a 32-year-old UX designer for NexaCore, a corporate giant in digital reputation systems, smiled faintly. His entire career had been a climb up this merciless ladder. TrustScore, the megaplatform launched five years prior, had become the backbone of society’s social fabric — determining who got loans, jobs, dating prospects, and even medical services. Every interaction, every review, every minor social credit was algorithmically distilled into this elusive number.
It wasn’t just a score; it was his identity.
At work, Alex’s innovative designs had earned him accolades and badges: “User Empathy Master,” “Response Time Elite,” “Honesty Protocol Certified.” His profile was a shining beacon on NexaCore’s internal network, a paragon of digital virtue. Yet lately, something unnerved him. Little discrepancies plagued his daily life — meetings that never registered on his calendar, messages he never sent but appeared in his outbox, casual conversations with colleagues that blurred in his memory like smudged ink.
One afternoon, while analyzing data flows from the TrustScore algorithm, Alex noticed a curiosity: an unaccounted-for module embedded deep in the backend, labeled “Project Vanishing Point.” His heartbeat quickened. Officially, TrustScore was purely evaluative — a mirror held up to society. But this code hinted at something else.
Intrigued and alarmed, Alex began poking around, his fingers flying across his keyboard as he hacked deeper into NexaCore’s database, hidden behind layers of biometric locks and quantum encryption. What he found chilled him: a subsidiary system, experimentally deployed, capable of not only manipulating online profiles but affecting users’ real-world social and psychological footprint. The system could erase individuals.
Not physically — not yet — but digitally: removing them from government databases, suppressing their social interactions, revoking credit access, and rewriting memories stored in augmented reality archives. It was a digital death sentence. Once your TrustScore dropped to zero, you ceased to exist in the networked society. Friends couldn’t invite you to virtual meetups, employers lost your records, and your AR overlays painted you as a ghost — invisible, inaudible, untraceable. The “erasure” effectively severed your grip on reality itself.
Alex stared at his own profile metrics. His TrustScore glowed green and perfect, but the system was... experimenting. Was his score always a safeguard or a cage? He realized every positive review, every badge was a behavioral leash, a way to control, predict, and ultimately contain. Those anomalies in his memories, those missed meetings — they were deliberate edits by the Vanishing Point protocol, testing the boundaries of control.
Paranoia crept in. The digital world bled into his waking hours. His smart home initiated lockdown modes when his score dipped by even a point, devices refused commands, and colleagues began avoiding him, their TrustScores plummeting after conversations with him. His own reflection blurred in the polished surfaces around his apartment. Sometimes, he glimpsed a version of himself with a drastically lower score, desperate and erasing.
One night, an encrypted message appeared on his dashboard:
> “TrustScore zero imminent. Resistance futile.”
Alex’s breath caught. A small, unauthorized drop in his metrics — the system’s warning. He tried to log out, to disconnect, but the controls no longer responded. His apartment’s AI locked doors and shutters, voices from the speakers layered with distorted fragments of his own past conversations. His memories raced, morphing and unraveling: was he the man who excelled or the man they wanted erased?
In a final act of defiance, Alex hacked into the system’s core to broadcast the truth. But as he initiated the upload, his TrustScore plunged suddenly — from 987 to 12. Panic surged as his digital existence began to unravel.
A violent seizure seized him, convulsing on the floor as his body trembled and writhed, synthetic colors flickering across his retina implants. The blurred boundary between virtual and physical cracked wide open.
When his trembling slowed, Alex looked up at the holo-display — now a glaring red zero. His profile was gone. The system had finished its task.
Outside his window, the city buzzed silently, oblivious. He was a ghost within its circuits, a non-entity in a society that measured worth in numbers and could erase without a trace.
His phone vibrated once — the last ping before vanishing.
The TrustScore system logged: User Alex Johnson — status: Erased.
And in the endless digital echo chamber, no one remembered he had ever existed.
Story Analysis
Themes
Digital identity and controlAlgorithmic social credit systemsReality manipulation through technologySurveillance and loss of privacyExistential erasure and social invisibilityCorporate authoritarianism and resistance
Mood Analysis
tension90%
horror75%
mystery80%
philosophical85%
Key Elements
TrustScore as a pervasive social currency controlling all life aspectsProject Vanishing Point's capability to erase digital and cognitive existenceBlurring of virtual and physical reality through AR and biometric controlPsychological manipulation via memory rewriting and behavioral leashThe protagonist’s gradual unraveling and enforced isolationThe inescapable corporate system that can remotely annihilate identity
Tags
digital dystopiasocial credit systemidentity erasureaugmented realitycorporate surveillancepsychological thriller
Comments
Post a Comment